It's a wonder how New York Yankees general manager Brian Cashman keeps his job. His most recent quote of “I don’t have anybody who is untouchable, but some guys are more touchable than others. At the end of the day, I am legitimately open to any idea. I’ve had a lot of bad ones, either thrown by me or on the receiving end from somebody else to me. That’s what we’re here for; to throw a lot of crap out there and see what sticks” makes me believe that myself, or anyone really, could work as a general manager of a major league baseball team and have the same results at the end of the season as so-called professionals such as Cashman have.
Trading catcher John Ryan Murphy for Twins outfielder Aaron Hicks wasn't a bad deal, but Cashman and the Yankees would be foolish to deal any of their top prospects, such as shortstop Juan Mateo, outfielder Aaron Judge, and first baseman Doug Bird, among others. Let's keep these guys and see what they can do on the field, starting during the 2017 and 2018 seasons. Players signed to big contracts, such as Carlos Beltran, really haven't done much, so why not take a chance on a prospect?
Showing posts with label New York Times. Show all posts
Showing posts with label New York Times. Show all posts
Friday, November 13, 2015
Wednesday, April 2, 2014
MLB baseball Power Rankings - April 1, 2014
MLB baseball Power Rankings - April 1, 2014. All MLB teams ranked from best to worst at the start of the season:
1)
Yankees
2)
Pirates
3)
Dodgers
4)
Indians
5)
Nationals
6)
Royals
7)
Rays
8)
A’s
9)
Reds
10)
Red Sox
11)
Cardinals
12)
Tigers
13)
Angels
14)
Braves
15)
Orioles
16)
Rangers
17)
Diamondbacks
18)
Giants
19)
Padres
20)
Brewers
21)
Rockies
22)
Blue Jays
23)
Mets
24)
Phillies
25)
Cubs
26)
Mariners
27)
Twins
28)
White Sox
29)
Marlins
30)
Astros
Labels:
baseball,
Derek Jeter,
Dodgers,
ESPN,
football,
Fox,
Goldman Sachs,
HBO,
MLB,
New York City,
New York Times,
New York Yankees,
NFL,
nfl draft,
Pirates,
steroids,
TV,
TV Guide,
Vikings,
Yankees
Monday, November 18, 2013
Employers like Katia Beauchamp of Birchbox make me laugh
I just read an interview with Katia Beauchamp, the founder of Birchbox, an
online business. She was discussing the hiring process at her company, and how
if candidates describe a past job as not fun, she does not consider hiring the
person. She claims it's a person's job to make your life fun.
Well I would agree it's up to each individual to find their own version of happiness in their personal life, but to think that any job can be made "fun" is silly and only shows that the person saying it has lived a sheltered and privileged life.
Lots of people are in lousy jobs, mainly because of lousy managers. Some people just can't wave a magic wand and put themselves into the job of their dreams. There are other factors at play, some of which are out of their control.
To not hire someone because they were in a bad situation is short-sighted and narrow minded. What is important for hiring managers to consider is, what can the candidate do to solve problems in the job that I'm hiring for? What has gone on at another job in someone's past is irrelevant. As is their past and current salary.
The "no one is ever allowed to say anything negative" nonsense that some recruiters believe in is silly. Some people wouldn't be interviewing for new jobs if something bad hadn't happened at the last one. I guess hiring managers would rather be lied to.
If the person is a good candidate for a job, I'd rather know more about what you're looking for in a job with a potential company and why you weren't satisfied with your previous job, instead of saying everything was all peaches and cream.
Well I would agree it's up to each individual to find their own version of happiness in their personal life, but to think that any job can be made "fun" is silly and only shows that the person saying it has lived a sheltered and privileged life.
Lots of people are in lousy jobs, mainly because of lousy managers. Some people just can't wave a magic wand and put themselves into the job of their dreams. There are other factors at play, some of which are out of their control.
To not hire someone because they were in a bad situation is short-sighted and narrow minded. What is important for hiring managers to consider is, what can the candidate do to solve problems in the job that I'm hiring for? What has gone on at another job in someone's past is irrelevant. As is their past and current salary.
The "no one is ever allowed to say anything negative" nonsense that some recruiters believe in is silly. Some people wouldn't be interviewing for new jobs if something bad hadn't happened at the last one. I guess hiring managers would rather be lied to.
If the person is a good candidate for a job, I'd rather know more about what you're looking for in a job with a potential company and why you weren't satisfied with your previous job, instead of saying everything was all peaches and cream.
Labels:
Birchbox,
career,
careers,
Chase,
dream,
finance,
Goldman Sachs,
interview,
job,
jobs,
JP Morgan,
Katia Beauchamp,
manager,
money,
New York Times,
nfl draft,
Puerto Rico,
recruiter,
tax,
Trump
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)